tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-41520291336817920302024-03-13T17:29:15.289-05:00Hacking Christianitya bottom-up faith<br>
in a top-down worldRev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.comBlogger578125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-53372231888664828402012-01-18T19:54:00.005-06:002012-01-18T19:54:54.496-06:00We've moved to HackingChristianity.netWe've moved to <a href="http://hackingchristianity.net/">HackingChristianity.net</a><br />
<br />
Like, we moved there in September 2010.<br />
<br />
So if you are visiting here, <a href="http://hackingchristianity.net/">go to the new place</a>.<br />
<br />
Thanks!Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-38215783651050195362010-09-11T13:06:00.000-05:002010-09-11T13:06:53.497-05:00Holy Wars, Holy Texts, Holy Living<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ae/Large_Koran.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ae/Large_Koran.jpg" width="128" /></a></div>Per <a href="http://tallskinnykiwi.typepad.com/tallskinnykiwi/2010/09/water-for-pilgrims-blog-a-koran-day.html">Tall Skinny Kiwi's call for bloggers</a>, I'm blogging a reading from the Qur'an today. Even though <a href="http://draft.blogger.com/goog_2122660609">the planned </a><s><a href="http://draft.blogger.com/goog_2122660609">publicity stunt</a></s><a href="http://blog.hackingchristianity.net/2010/09/can-we-stop-calling-quran-burners.html"> burning</a> didn't take place, there's no reason not to fill the void of hate with education.<br />
<br />
When Jesus is asked what is the greatest commandment, Jesus replies with the Shema (Deut 6:4-9) and a commandment about loving your neighbor. Here it is in Christianity and in Islam side by side:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength.’ The second is this, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.”<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">Mark 12:30-31, NRSV</div></blockquote><blockquote>"Worship Allah and join none with him (in worship); and do good to parents, kinsfolk, orphans, the poor, the neighbor who is near of kin, the neighbor who is stranger, the companion by your side"<br />
<div style="text-align: right;">Qur'an, chapter 4, verse 36</div></blockquote>The verse in the Qur'an actually has many translations due to the difficulty of translating Arabic to English. <a href="http://islamawakened.com/Quran/4/36/">Here's a list of the varied translations</a>. But the key point of difficulty is the first section: <b>Worship Allah and join none with him</b>. This first verse is a direct challenge to the claims of Christianity that Jesus was God's son. On the Dome of the Rock at Mecca, it is <a href="http://www.islamic-awareness.org/History/Islam/Inscriptions/DoTR.html">inscribed in various places</a> that Jesus was just a messenger and that it is unthinkable that God would have a son or embodied divinity. This was inscribed after the Crusades (Christians v. Muslims) and is thus<b> a political as well as theological statement</b>.<br />
<br />
We would think this would be a stumbling block to relations with Islam and Christianity, but if you think about it, the Jewish faith has denied Jesus' Messiahship since the Incarnation. They deny the basic tenet of our faith: that God has a son who is the Messiah and is Jesus Christ. <b>Both of these world religions deny the basic building block of Christianity: the Incarnation</b>. I cannot tell you how much of my theology is built on the Incarnation, and thus it is an important affirmation. <br />
<br />
And yet in the verse above, <b>theology is in an uneasy marriage to praxis</b> (action). It's OK to make a theological affirmation, but join hands and serve one another even those who are infidels, heretics, or violent towards you. <br />
<br />
Thus in the Qur'an verse above, <b>we have the model for interfaith living</b>. Make your theological affirmations, hold tight to them, and serve your neighbor with the highest of ideals. Interfaith centers, places of worship, theological seminaries (ie. Claremont), global responses to tragedy: they all hold tight to their faith but put their hands and feet in service to their neighbor.<br />
<br />
<div style="margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 0px;">It's true that we disagree on the basic precepts of our theology and will likely never come to agreement. But it is also true that <b>each religion is called by their holy books to holy living.</b> Our history has a bloody past of errant Holy Wars, from the Crusades to today. When we place our theological certainty atop of action and care for our neighbor, we fall short. We try to burn what we have built. Maybe we can continue the tradition of Holy Living, of holding fast to our beliefs but unclenching our fists and serving the world around us.</div><br />
May our future hope shine brighter than the flames of intolerance and hatred.Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-70057773917782768342010-09-10T07:06:00.001-05:002010-09-10T07:06:00.095-05:00Progressive NOT Permissive ChurchSigh. I know it is satire and humor, but I get pretty annoyed by the tired "Progressive" is a code word for "morally lax and permissive church" meme. <br />
<br />
For instance, this episode is up for an Emmy (W<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">hat? They have regional Emmys? Really?)</span> from the <a href="http://www.steveandkathygray.com/">Steve and Kathy Gray show</a> (background <a href="http://www.prweb.com/releases/Christian-tv/Emmy-awards/prweb1448664.htm">here</a>)<br />
<br />
<object height="264" width="424"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4MDnjN3CP4E?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4MDnjN3CP4E?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="424" height="264"></embed></object><br />
<br />
Here's the basic sentiments about what "Progressive" means from the video:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>We don't worry about God, we worry about you!</li>
<li>We'll make the religion to meet your needs.</li>
<li>It's never your fault.</li>
<li>We'll change things just for you.</li>
<li>It's all about you.</li>
<li>It's about feeling good about you.</li>
<li>Marijuana, violent video games are cool</li>
</ul><br />
See, <b>I don't get this meme</b>. Practically every one of those things could be leveled at megachurches like Osteen's Lakewood Church or Warren's Saddleback church who craft worship to be less language-offensive, less liturgical, less depth of theology so that they meet the felt needs of the congregation in a surface way. <br />
<br />
In response to the above:<br />
<br />
<ul><li>Progressive churches deal with questions about <b>whether God really worries</b> about the things we think God worries about.</li>
<li>Progressive churches <b>critique church tradition and expressions</b> to see how it can better meet the needs of people long kept on the sidelines of the church.</li>
<li>Progressive churches <b>emphasize societal responsibility</b> alongside personal responsibility for fault.</li>
<li>Progressive churches realize <b>care for individuals may challenge sacrosanct issues</b> via inclusive language.</li>
<li>Progressive churches don't do Halo tournaments or "<b>end justifies the means</b>" ministries.</li>
</ul><br />
I just don't get it.<br />
<br />
The only thing I can think of is that "Progressive" is code for "sexual permissiveness" regarding gay issues and abortion. That's all I've got. <br />
<br />
Funny video? Yeah, sure. Ridiculous caricature of Progressivism? Absolutely. But caricatures should over-emphasize a true feature of a topic and I just don't see this outside of sexual permissiveness. So is that all it is about?<br />
<br />
Someone <i>please</i> tell me how all these accusations come from anything other than moral permisiveness on <i>sexual </i>issues and I would love to have the conversation.<br />
<br />
Thoughts?Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-2370010082917383442010-09-09T14:27:00.000-05:002010-09-09T14:27:50.118-05:00Economy of Love video curriculum [review]<i>This is a book review as part of being an </i><a href="http://viralbloggers.com/"><i>Ooze select blogger</i></a><i>. As always, while reviews can be bought, the content is my own honest opinion!</i><br />
<br />
Usually I put together a long review for subjects that I'm passionate about: peace and justice are often those topics. However, the <a href="http://viralbloggers.com/2010/08/economy-of-love-by-darin-peterson-and-shane-claiborne/">Economy of Love</a> video curriculum is so short that I barely know what to write about. You can click the link for the outline but the 5-part video series looks at these topics:<br />
<br />
<ul><a href="http://viralbloggers.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/EOLsg166_250.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://viralbloggers.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/EOLsg166_250.jpg" /></a>
<li>Week 1: <b>Tension </b>– Being the hands and feet of Jesus in a broken world</li>
<li>Week 2: <b>Enough </b>– Christ’s demand to love our neighbor through redistribution</li>
<li>Week 3: <b>Vulnerable </b>– Living lives that collide with those of the marginalized</li>
<li>Week 4: <b>Filled </b>– Is the gospel we preach good news for the rich and poor alike?</li>
<li>Week 5: <b>Practice </b>– Following Jesus with our hands, our feet, and our resources</li>
</ul><br />
Basically, the discussion revolves around going against consumer culture which feeds on people and <b>starting a relational tithe</b> [<a href="http://relationaltithe.com/">website</a>] that not only gives money but gives of ourselves. That subject is explored in the different aspects above. The videos, in contrast to Nooma or other video teachings, are less than 4 minutes long and consist of a voice-over by Shane Claborne with depictions of the lesson. Very short, sufficient for an introduction or re-focusing moment in a teaching, not a closer to a lesson.<br />
<br />
The best part? The book has an <b>annotated script</b> of the voice-over, complete with scripture references, more questions, and brings depth to the topic. That makes it easy for personal study to go deeper if you want. There's also accompanying questions and quotes in the back.<br />
<br />
I guess that from the <a href="http://viralbloggers.com/2010/08/economy-of-love-by-darin-peterson-and-shane-claiborne/">Economy of Love</a> I was looking for more content rather than questions, more guiding information than guiding questions. I think we get that we are consumeristic and can ask ourselves the questions but at the end if we don't have examples of stories or life testimonies that can inspire us through a vision of a transformed life, then we are left feeling a bit lost at the end. I missed the testimonies or examples of changed lives that could inspire our own.<br />
<br />
So if you are armed with information already about consumerism and our culture and are looking for guiding questions, or if you already have an idea of what response your church wants to give to a community and are looking for inspiring others, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Economy-Love-Creating-Community-Enough/dp/0834125447?ie=UTF8&tag=hackinchrist-20&link_code=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969" target="_blank">Economy of Love</a><img alt="" border="0" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=hackinchrist-20&l=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969&o=1&a=0834125447" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important; padding: 0px !important;" width="1" /> is a decent shot at it.<br />
<br />
Anyone else seen the series and would like to comment?Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-2113560210874376222010-09-09T11:00:00.001-05:002010-09-09T11:00:02.996-05:00The Third ConversationI had a follow-up thought on the Mario Bros Discipleship post on meeting people where they are in biblical difficulty.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.elca.org/~/media/Images/Growing%20in%20Faith/Worship/Seasons/YearABC.gif" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://www.elca.org/~/media/Images/Growing%20in%20Faith/Worship/Seasons/YearABC.gif" /></a></div><br />
The evidence for the bible having adaptive multi-faceted learning is evidenced by when <b>an entire church is lectionary-based in its curriculum or studies the same scripture on Sundays</b>. When the children, the youth, the adults, and the worship service all reflect on the same scripture, you get tons of conversations about it.<br />
<br />
But then it leads to what I call "the third conversation" when a family drives home. They've talked about the scripture in the Sunday School, they've heard it reflected in church, and then when they drive home they get the third conversation of "how did your class handle it" and all ages are able to participate and consider new things. I wonder what new information and education comes from that third conversation...<br />
<br />
Thoughts? Have you done total-church Christian education based on the same scripture?Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-67387171466049467252010-09-09T10:09:00.000-05:002010-09-09T10:09:58.755-05:00Mario Bros Discipleship<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">One of the advances sought after in video gaming is <b>games that respond to a players skill and either increase or decrease the difficulty on the fly</b>. We are used to clicking "Easy, Normal, Hard, Eeeevil" and knowing that we'll get a slightly different experience in the video game. Take <b>Mario Bros</b> as an example. We can always make really sadistic versions of video games <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9JrEeS6484&feature=related">like this one</a> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">(for a </span><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">really</span></i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;"> <b><i>really </i></b>NSFW obscenities-laden version, </span><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3C1BSbq5aB0"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">watch here</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">...I warned you!)</span> but they do not gradually introduce challenges to us.</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: left;">What is now being sought after is video games that adapt <i>on the fly</i>, so that if you complete a level with plenty of time to spare, the next level is a bit harder. The newest custom adaptation of Mario Bros (<a href="http://games.slashdot.org/story/10/09/08/055245/Infinite-Mario-With-Dynamic-Difficulty-Adjustment">discussed here on Slashdot</a>) not only gives you more enemies (like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlkMs4ZHHr8">this video</a>) but also puts holes in the ground and makes your technical skill increase on the fly. </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://users.soe.ucsc.edu/~bweber/dokuwiki/lib/exe/fetch.php?cache=cache&media=mario100.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="http://users.soe.ucsc.edu/~bweber/dokuwiki/lib/exe/fetch.php?cache=cache&media=mario100.png" width="320" /></a></div><br />
In other words, instead of choosing a difficult path, the game adapts to your skill and increases or decreases difficulty based on your progress.<br />
<br />
It strikes me that <b>our own discipleship is the same way</b>. It is a sad few of us want a hard bible study or Sunday School curriculum early in our discipleship or even late in it. I've seen Sunday School classes empty when a challenging series is began, reinforcing the UM Country Club status even more.<br />
<br />
Perhaps what we want is a study or topic that <b>meets us where we are</b> and then <b>presents us with growing questions</b>. And we are sold study after study that purports to do just that.<br />
<br />
While I've read and seen more curriculums and studies than I can count, there's only one that does this well: I've found that <b>the Bible</b> itself is the perfect incarnation of Mario Bros on-the-fly difficulty. Reading my marked-up bible and seeing my thoughts and comments from days of yore (especially as a youth) are really interesting and cause me to reconsider my own discipleship and thoughts. Skimming gets me one lesson, deep reading gets me another, reading a commentary gets me another, and then reading it alone <i>lectio-divina</i> style gets me another. No matter where I am in my discipleship, I get something out of it.<br />
<br />
Perhaps if you are a Sunday School teacher and frustrated with challenging curriculum, take a cue from a parishioner of mine who is a Sunday School teacher 40 year veteran: <b>just start reading the bible with the class</b>. There's always something there, and when interest is piqued, then you know where to start deeper study.<br />
<br />
You don't have to click "Easy Medium Hard." No one else has to know which difficulty you are at. <b>All you have to do is start the game, and the challenges will come your way</b>. Show up, play the game, and let the lessons come to you.<br />
<br />
Thoughts?Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-3978133161708520452010-09-09T10:08:00.000-05:002010-09-09T10:08:56.054-05:00Can we stop calling Qur'an burners a Church?Some facts about the church and the pastor:<br />
<ol><li>Dove World Outreach <a href="http://www.pantagraph.com/news/national/article_c69bedbb-341a-5d57-ba72-e40e234a4e8e.html">lost its tax-exemption</a> for a time due to the fact that the pastor ran a furniture business out of its location.</li>
<ul><li>"Its property has served as a sometime storage site for Jones' furniture business, a violation of Dove's tax-exempt status that was punished with a county fine and partial loss of nonprofit standing, The Gainesville (Fla.) Sun reported. Jones previously founded a small church in Germany, the Christian Community of Cologne, and was accused by his daughter and a former church elder of using donations to enrich himself, the Sun reported."</li>
</ul>
<li>The pastor's <a href="http://www.pantagraph.com/news/national/article_c69bedbb-341a-5d57-ba72-e40e234a4e8e.html">certification came from the Internet</a>. If I knew it was that easy, I woulda ditched the UMC a long time ago with all it's "education" and "accountability" requirements. Sheesh.</li>
<ul><li>"[Jones] says he was given the diploma by the California Graduate School of Theology, an obscure school that boasts on its Web site that it's so independent, it has never been accredited. In 2002, Jones was convicted by a Cologne administrative court of falsely using the title and was fined $3,800, German media reported."<br />
</li>
</ul>
<li>The <a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/file/dove-church-rulebook">rule book for members</a> entering the Dove World Outreach tells youth to not contact family members or go home even in case of a funeral.</li>
<ul><li>"During Academy you are not allowed to visit family members or friends or receive visitors...family occasions like weddings, funerals, and Birthdays are no exception to this rule."</li>
</ul></ol><div>In other words, a church that has (a) lost its tax-exempt status for selling furniture (b) has a pastor ordained over the internet and (c) does not practice grace or forgiveness with rigid isolationism...this location represents Christianity and America to the international Muslim world? Ugh.<br />
<br />
<b>The Qur'an burners no more represent Christianity than the 9/11 terrorists represent Islam.</b></div>Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-69137972076770331702010-09-08T09:04:00.000-05:002010-09-08T09:04:22.047-05:00God is no longer male...if you want.<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.kaosgl.com/resim/intersex/intersex_logo.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="224" src="http://www.kaosgl.com/resim/intersex/intersex_logo.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><br />
There's usually a debate over <b>inclusive language</b> in the worship service, liturgy, or hymnody. In an established congregation, moving them to use an inclusive version of a hymn or the Lord's Prayer takes a lot of time and grace. In new or planted congregations, using inclusive language from the get-go usually makes for a smooth transition as people know if they attend that congregation that this version will be used.<br />
<br />
I do respect that for some people, using the traditional language and masculine references to God are deeply personal and comfortable. There's also the orthodox position which holds tradition and biblical references sacrosanct so changing the gender is out of the question for them. Thus movements towards inclusive language of God and humanity have a lot of conversation partners!<br />
<br />
To this chasm, I think the Scottish Episcopal Church has a good way of going about it: exploring non-masculine language liturgies <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/7982904/God-no-longer-male-Scottish-Episcopal-Church-rules.html">as an option for priests who want to use them</a>.<br />
<blockquote>The new form of worship, which removes words such as "Lord, he, his, him" and "mankind" from services, has been written by the church in an attempt to acknowledge that God is "beyond human gender". Episcopalian bishops have approved the introduction of more "inclusive" language, which deliberately removes references suggesting that God is of male gender.<br />
...<br />
The alterations have been made to <b>provide an alternative</b> to the established 1982 Liturgy, which, like the Bible, refers to God as a man. The new order of service, which <b>can be used</b> by priests if they have difficulties with a male God, has been produced by the church's Liturgy Committee in consultation with the Faith & Order Board of General Synod and the College of Bishops.</blockquote>There's no top-down dictation of "this is how your service should be run." There's no throwing away of tradition in churches that want to hold tight to the traditional liturgy. Instead there's official blessing for an alternative order of worship and liturgy that allow priests and worship leaders to use them if they choose.<br />
<br />
What's wrong with exploring the different liturgies and <b>presenting them as options</b>? As United Methodists, we have <i>four </i>version of the Word and Table: some with music, some with long liturgies. Why not one with inclusive language for those that want it?<br />
<br />
Thoughts about alternative liturgies that you don't HAVE to use but are made with official blessing for the diversity of the church body?<br />
<br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">(picture credit: </span><a href="http://www.womanist-musings.com/"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">Womanist Musings</span></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">)</span>Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-79428217407852278082010-09-07T14:45:00.001-05:002010-09-07T15:05:43.374-05:00Bohemian Star Wars RhapsodyThere are some days that I RT anything Star Wars that my google reader spits at me. Usually I wait to make it not seem obvious that I'm RTing, but this one is just incredible I can't wait. BIG hat tip to <a href="http://exploringourmatrix.blogspot.com/2010/09/midichlorian-rhapsody.html">Prof. McGrath</a> and <a href="http://honeyandlocusts.wordpress.com/2010/09/07/combing-the-net-972010/">Locusts and Honey.</a> <i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: small;">(edit: originally attributed to John the Methodist...thanks Matt for catching the false attribution)</span></i><br />
<br />
It's a parody of "Bohemian Rhapsody" by Queen with Star Wars content. They walk through the entire prequel trilogy in various stages of drama of the song.<br />
<br />
Favorite line: "Mace Windu No!"<br />
<br />
<object height="278" width="450"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hpvlTVgeivU?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hpvlTVgeivU?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="450" height="278"></embed></object><br />
<br />
Brilliant, eh?Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-8203658870094782642010-09-07T11:55:00.000-05:002010-09-07T11:55:14.124-05:00The Lord's Prayer, Aramaic Peshitta version<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.aramaicpeshitta.com/images/peshitta.JPG" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="152" src="http://www.aramaicpeshitta.com/images/peshitta.JPG" width="200" /></a></div>I'm doing a wedding for a couple in two months and they requested a different version of the Lord's Prayer than I've seen before. The footnote states that it is "adapted from a literal translation of Matthew 6:9-13 from the Aramaic Peshitta text." Check it out:<br />
<br />
==========<br />
<br />
Our Creator who is everywhere, let Your name be set apart,<br />
Your spirit come. Let Your desire be, as in the universe, also on earth.<br />
Provide us our needful bread from day to day<br />
and free us from our offenses, as also we have freed our offenders.<br />
And do not let us enter into temptation, but separate us from error.<br />
For to You belong the kingdom, the power, and the song and praise, from all ages throughout the ages. Amen.<br />
<br />
==========<br />
<br />
Thoughts?Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-4969102622768346862010-08-31T20:54:00.001-05:002010-08-31T20:55:14.854-05:00Random: HTML5 , Google Chrome, and Ministry<a href="http://www.thewildernessdowntown.com/">This</a> is an INCREDIBLE experience. If you have <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Google Chrome</a> as your browser, check out <a href="http://www.thewildernessdowntown.com/">this website</a> and input an address in a major city. It's a really neat experience.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIhEZZkjIs6hLhvA1u8hnKUa27jxlyoH1NxNQ68l_qWUnGKpsW9zniBbESO6OGT4nF8GogoU3UPwx_RuXuySXm-rCAvGKBS06tIaN-I97KzqyzQJiGjjnbwJM7JhzTI3-K7PegbyDxm1tN/s1600/blog+upload.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="243" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjIhEZZkjIs6hLhvA1u8hnKUa27jxlyoH1NxNQ68l_qWUnGKpsW9zniBbESO6OGT4nF8GogoU3UPwx_RuXuySXm-rCAvGKBS06tIaN-I97KzqyzQJiGjjnbwJM7JhzTI3-K7PegbyDxm1tN/s400/blog+upload.jpg" width="400" /></a></div><br />
Can you imagine the immersive effect this could have on a church website?<br />
<br />
(h/t John Saddington "<a href="http://churchcrunch.com/the-power-and-potential-of-googles-chrome-html5/">Church Crunch</a>")Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-38486431956846089372010-08-31T20:30:00.000-05:002010-08-31T20:30:30.091-05:00Gospel Ewok SongThis is why the Internet was born. There's even a cameo <b><i>sermon </i></b>by Lando Calrissian (Billy Dee Williams). It's magic.<br />
<br />
(h/t Prof. McGrath "<a href="http://exploringourmatrix.blogspot.com/2010/08/ewoks-gospel-song.html">Exploring Our Matrix</a>")<br />
<br />
<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Xdd0edT-BeE?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Xdd0edT-BeE?fs=1&hl=en_US&rel=0&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-28805527152671615392010-08-25T15:26:00.000-05:002010-08-25T15:26:19.067-05:00[Followup WWJB] Then you might be a...Faithful readers will remember the discussion of the <a href="http://blog.hackingchristianity.net/2010/07/wwjb-what-would-jesus-burn-badhack.html">church in Florida that is hosting a Qur'an-burning day</a> in a few weeks. We talked about their lack of hospitality or understanding of the issue (<a href="http://blog.hackingchristianity.net/2010/07/wwjb-what-would-jesus-burn-badhack.html">What Would Jesus Burn</a>?).<br />
<br />
Well....it got better. Or worse.<br />
<br />
They accepted the help of a Christian Militia group called "Right Wing Extreme" to help with security for the event. The Militia was going to send anywhere from 500-2000 gun-toting members to its defense. Violence to the Qur'an begats violent calls to arms it seems.<br />
<br />
But then today, the group decided to <a href="http://blog.christianitytoday.com/ctliveblog/archives/2010/08/militia_group_s.html">cut ties with the event</a>:<br />
<blockquote>“Right Wing Extreme has pulled support for the International Burning of the Koran day and will not attend the event,” the group announced in a 1:50 a.m. press release on its website. “After much thought and prayer the organization’s leadership determined this event does not glorify GOD in way that leads the lost to Jesus Christ.”<br />
The group, which bills itself in the release as an “armed Christian conservative group,” says they got started in April 2009 after a department of Homeland Security report called “Right Wing Extremism,” which highlighted the radical far right’s revitalization since President Barack Obama took office.<br />
The group considers Islam a “cult” and blasts the President for his support of the Park51 Islamic center which a Muslim group plans to build near Ground Zero in New York. But they do not think burning Islam’s holy scripture will solve any problems.<br />
“Dove World Outreach are our brothers and sisters in Christ,” the release says. “However we ask that they not hold this event <b>for the reason that it may diminish the work of the Holy Spirit to witness to Muslims</b>.”<br />
The release also quoted <b>James 1:19:</b> “Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath.”</blockquote>Here's the lesson for today, and I think it is a true one. I'll put it in big caps.<br />
<br />
<b><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">If a </span><u><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">militia</span></u><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"> decides you are too radical</span></i></b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">, then you </span><b><i><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">might </span></i></b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;">be on the wrong path. </span><br />
<br />
I suspect we've got a Pharaoh situation where the pastor and church have hardened their hearts beyond the point of backing down. But I'm certainly in prayer that their violent act will not escalate to the injury of anyone else, and I'm thankful for the militia group deciding to not participate in the escalation.Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-15110874212349007032010-08-16T07:17:00.007-05:002010-08-16T07:17:00.450-05:00Is the Church too big to fail?<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjObhI4ysIAn_t1Jm8CkGDt8ygoatnL06XQiC8iSIH46B3a2sVy4iTocTjvCauf78QIyGvHhq_xKQbmAjq9WvM1g1cfY87FdOmuhyUhokZO82fnBK9DCF3wfqirVmyxPPQG4SASoIjMX8yo/s1600/RestoringMethodism.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjObhI4ysIAn_t1Jm8CkGDt8ygoatnL06XQiC8iSIH46B3a2sVy4iTocTjvCauf78QIyGvHhq_xKQbmAjq9WvM1g1cfY87FdOmuhyUhokZO82fnBK9DCF3wfqirVmyxPPQG4SASoIjMX8yo/s320/RestoringMethodism.jpg" width="232" /></a>Oklahoma clergy have been assigned to read "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Restoring-Methodism-Decisions-Methodist-Churches/dp/B000Q03XG2?ie=UTF8&tag=hackinchrist-20&link_code=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969" target="_blank">Restoring Methodism</a><img alt="" border="0" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=hackinchrist-20&l=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969&o=1&a=B000Q03XG2" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important; padding: 0px !important;" width="1" />" by Drs. Molly & James Scott in preparation for a retreat with them in late September. Given that I was previously from a different area of the country, I happen to have attended the Scotts' seminar before and am familiar with their arguments and recommendations.<br />
<br />
In re-reading the book during some idle moments today, I noted <b><u>one argument that I'm unsure is valid</u></b>. <br />
<br />
On page 31, the Scotts write about why it is important to restore Methodism to its roots and originating practices:<br />
<blockquote>Restoration is the answer because it is unthinkable that God would abandon the institutionalized churches in America, as they compromise the vast majority - up to 90% - of the Christians in this country.</blockquote>I am unsure this as "unthinkable." God has done this before. God had abandoned the Chosen People to decades of attrition (the 40 years post-Exodus), disowned the stubborn nations (Jeremiah 3:8), and allowed its assimilation into other cultures (Pharisaic Judaism v. Roman Hellenism). God also allowed the destruction of the Temple and the Jews found much meaning and refocus in <a href="http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=329&letter=D#933">the Diaspora</a> that they wouldn't likely have found otherwise.<br />
<br />
God has done this before, taken away what we thought was "too big to fail." Can we really dismiss the horrifying thought that the Church as an institution has a time limit as well?<br />
<br />
<span id="fullpost">Perhaps the Scotts meant that numerical decline is not in God's plan for the Church. That's a valid interpretation, I think. But Jesus had multitudes following him, was an icon for church growth...but after his hard sermons, he was left with 12. Failure, right?<br />
<br />
Further, the Scotts counter their own argument themselves on page 53:<br />
<blockquote>It was not unusual for Mr. Wesley to examine a Society with 800 members and leave them with 400 members.</blockquote>So it is OK for the institutional church to shrink but not be destroyed? But isn't restoring Methodism about reversing the shrinking trend? Huh. <br />
<br />
To be clear, I'm not advocating a burn-it-down-and-start-over reform...<b>this blog would be called "Reformatting Christianity" if I did</b>. I'm as committed to righting the institutional church as the next pastor. <br />
<br />
But I do have to assume that <b>it <i>could </i>be God's plan</b> that the church burn to the ground and be risen from the ashes in a fiery Phoenix. And I have to wonder how best I could be an instrument of grace in the interim.<br />
<br />
<b>God is sovereign</b>. Let's not place anything (even the unthinkable) beyond God's possibilities, and seek instead to be instruments of God's grace no matter what may come next.<br />
<br />
Thoughts?</span>Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-85524390535286407102010-08-13T08:26:00.000-05:002010-08-13T08:26:56.345-05:00What if Worship was like an NBA game?<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/piZq6aX4wDQ?fs=1&hl=en_US&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/piZq6aX4wDQ?fs=1&hl=en_US&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
Thoughts?<br />
<br />
(h/t Ruach mailing list)Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-5711709438752891142010-08-07T06:10:00.000-05:002010-08-07T06:10:00.741-05:00Friends don't let friends babbleYou know the ones. Those people who when you ask to pray, you get a whole lot more in return: reams of churchy-talk and runs of "we just want to thank you for ____." It has a name, apparently, as seen in the video below. I know this makes light of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourette_syndrome">Tourette's syndrome</a> but it has an interesting point: <b>does dipping into hyper-religious speak distract from your goal of embodying Christ?</b> Check it out:<br />
<br />
<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9PNjPPjvbxw&hl=en_US&fs=1?color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9PNjPPjvbxw&hl=en_US&fs=1?color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
(h/t <a href="http://chadholtz.net/">Chad Holtz's facebook</a>)<br />
<br />
Thoughts?Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-36949182847182834012010-08-04T09:03:00.000-05:002010-08-04T09:03:01.547-05:00Trust in the Slow Work of God<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.dna-computing.com/photography/Gallery/images/cjm001/LiquidGlass_L.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="214" src="http://www.dna-computing.com/photography/Gallery/images/cjm001/LiquidGlass_L.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Glass is one of the slowest forms of liquid (<a href="http://www.dna-computing.com/photography/yourpictures.aspx">h/t</a>)</td></tr>
</tbody></table>If I had to name a theological assurance that I put my trust into each and every day, it would be "<b>Trust in the Slow Work of God.</b>" Now, I usually understood it to be an amalgamation of Psalm affirmations (Psalm 37:7-9 comes to mind), but I just found out it is actually a <i>poem </i>by a Jesuit <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Teilhard_de_Chardin">Pierre Teilhard de Chardin</a>, though he takes a slightly different angle than I understand it. I'm sure you already knew that, but it was a gaping hole in my reading!<br />
<br />
Here's his poem for yours (and my) benefit (h/t <a href="http://bogners.typepad.com/church/2006/10/patient_trust.html">Steve Bogner</a>):<br />
===================================<br />
<br />
<b>Above all, trust in the slow work of God.</b><br />
We are quite naturally impatient in everything<br />
to reach the end without delay.<br />
We would like to skip the intermediate stages.<br />
We are impatient of being on the way to something<br />
unknown, something new.<br />
And yet, it is the law of all progress<br />
that it is made by passing through<br />
some stages of instability - <br />
and that it may take a very long time.<br />
<br />
And so I think it is with you;<br />
your ideas mature gradually - let them grow,<br />
let them shape themselves, without undue haste.<br />
Don't try to force them on,<br />
as though you could be today what time,<br />
(that is to say, grace and circumstances<br />
acting on your own good will)<br />
will make of you tomorrow.<br />
<br />
Only God could say what this new spirit<br />
gradually forming in you will be.<br />
Give our Lord the benefit of believing<br />
that his hand is leading you,<br />
and accept the anxiety of feeling yourself<br />
in suspense and incomplete.Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-40294291122505573712010-08-03T18:47:00.000-05:002010-08-03T18:47:17.549-05:00"Methodism = the University of Phoenix of religions"It's a rough week to be a Methodist.<br />
<br />
First, Jesus Needs New PR snarked at Methodists, saying <a href="http://www.jesusneedsnewpr.net/10-things-you-should-do-if-you-get-left-behind/?awesm=fbshare.me_AQYK6">they would be left behind</a> (#6). Now yesterday Jon Stewart took some potshots at the characterization of Methodists as "not standing for anything" followers of Christ. <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-august-2-2010/wedding-of-the-decade-of-the-century-of-the-millennium">Start out at 4:20</a> then watch for at least 30 seconds:<br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="353" style="background-color: whitesmoke; color: #333333; font: normal normal normal 11px/normal arial; width: 360px;"><tbody>
<tr style="background-color: #e5e5e5;" valign="middle"><td style="padding: 2px 1px 0px 5px;"><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/" style="color: #333333; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">The Daily Show With Jon Stewart</a></td><td style="font-weight: bold; padding: 2px 5px 0px 5px; text-align: right;">Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c</td></tr>
<tr style="height: 14px;" valign="middle"><td colspan="2" style="padding: 2px 1px 0px 5px;"><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-august-2-2010/wedding-of-the-decade-of-the-century-of-the-millennium" style="color: #333333; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Wedding of the Decade of the Century of the Millennium</a><a href="http://draft.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=4152029133681792030"></a></td></tr>
<tr style="background-color: #353535; height: 14px;" valign="middle"><td colspan="2" style="overflow: hidden; padding: 2px 5px 0px 5px; text-align: right; width: 360px;"><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/" style="color: #96deff; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">www.thedailyshow.com</a></td></tr>
<tr valign="middle"><td colspan="2" style="padding: 0px;"><embed allowfullscreen="true" allownetworking="all" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" flashvars="autoPlay=false" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:342881" style="display: block;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" wmode="window"></embed></td></tr>
<tr style="height: 18px;" valign="middle"><td colspan="2" style="padding: 0px;"><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="100%" style="margin: 0px; text-align: center;"><tbody>
<tr valign="middle"><td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;"><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/" style="color: #333333; font: 10px arial; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Daily Show Full Episodes</a></td><td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;"><a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/" style="color: #333333; font: 10px arial; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Political Humor</a></td><td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;"><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/videos/tag/Tea+Party" style="color: #333333; font: 10px arial; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Tea Party</a></td></tr>
</tbody></table></td></tr>
</tbody></table><br />
Transcript:<br />
<blockquote><b>Stewart</b>: Being a Methodist is easy. It's like the <a href="http://www.phoenix.edu/">University of Phoenix</a> of religions: you just send them 50 bucks and click "I agree" and you are saved.</blockquote>Ha! Then again, you look at John Wesley's requirements for membership and compare them with today's and he may not be far off the mark.Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-45812417667277503762010-08-01T23:29:00.000-05:002010-08-01T23:29:21.607-05:00Fountain Filled with Blood Atonement<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6sXbHuATvo">This video</a> merited 34 comments in an hour on facebook from a dozen different churchworkers (clergy and laity). Lemme know what you think:<br />
<br />
<object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/a6sXbHuATvo&hl=en_US&fs=1?color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/a6sXbHuATvo&hl=en_US&fs=1?color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br />
<br />
Key gut-check moments for me were the completely unexpected <b>0:38</b>, and I was open-mouthed at<b> 3:44 </b>(though it did look like someone saw <i><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Carrie-Special-Sissy-Spacek/dp/B00005K3NR?ie=UTF8&tag=hackinchrist-20&link_code=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969" target="_blank">Carrie</a><img alt="" border="0" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=hackinchrist-20&l=btl&camp=213689&creative=392969&o=1&a=B00005K3NR" style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important; padding: 0px !important;" width="1" /></i> too much...h/t JAA). The Rockettes at <b>3:06 </b>almost made up for it though.<br />
<br />
Personally, I think videos like this are good in that they depict the viscerally disturbing aspects of blood atonement and are good conversation starters on atonement theories. It's like Mel Gibson's <i>The Passion...</i>I think that movie did more for discussion of alternate atonement theories than it probably intended! No understanding of atonement is complete or perfect and I think discussion of them is at once challenging but helpful in the long run.<br />
<br />
Thoughts on the video?Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-17274491032074234872010-07-31T07:46:00.000-05:002010-07-31T07:46:00.259-05:00Self-Justification Saturday<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r6/ScarletLewis12345/nerds.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r6/ScarletLewis12345/nerds.jpg" width="299" /></a></div><br />
You'll be happy to know that I can justify my video game skills as helpful to pastoral ministry:<br />
<ol><li><b>Violent Video Games = cool under pressure in meeting</b>. It appears that <a href="http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3180386">playing violent video games reduces hostility</a>. So that's how I can handle contentious meetings...I can thank being #2 in the world (quarterly) playing Unreal Tournament 2. Good to know!</li>
<li><b>Team-based games = lack of complacency in ministry</b>. It appears that youngsters who play World of Warcraft <a href="http://games.slashdot.org/story/10/07/22/0314218/emWorld-of-Warcraftem-Can-Boost-Your-Career?from=rss">have better team-building and goal-oriented skills</a> than others. While I was too far into ministry to have a WoW account or participate in any MMORPGs, there's plenty of team-based games under my belt.</li>
<li><b>If you jump-punch a brick, coins will come out</b>! (of your wallet to the Emergency Room...but still) (kidding)</li>
</ol><div>How about you? If you are a gamer, what did you learn that helps in your ministry or vocation? </div>Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-36688250963797077762010-07-30T07:32:00.009-05:002010-07-30T07:32:00.509-05:00The Pope's Mary Magdalene FAIL<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.piccolacasaeditrice.it/libro_BXVI2010.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="113" src="http://www.piccolacasaeditrice.it/libro_BXVI2010.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><br />
This is just terrible. <a href="http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/popes-book-on-jesus-edited-out-women/story-e6frg6so-1225898192849">The Pope has a new children's book</a> about Jesus and his 14 closest friends. It's pretty awesome that the Pope has commissioned a children's book, first time ever they think. And in case you were wondering, here's the 14 people who were deemed Jesus' SuperFriends (h/t <a href="http://www.episcopalcafe.com/lead/other_churches/pope_unfriends_mary_magdalene.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+episcopalcafe/lead+(The+Lead&utm_content=Google+Reader">The Episcopal Cafe</a>)<br />
<blockquote>Peter, his brother Andrew, James the older, John, Thomas, Matthew, Philip, Bartholomew, James the younger, Simon, Judas Thaddeus, Judas Iscariot, Matthias and Paul.</blockquote><a href="http://www.episcopalcafe.com/lead/Maria_Magdalene_crucifixion_detail.jpeg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://www.episcopalcafe.com/lead/Maria_Magdalene_crucifixion_detail.jpeg" width="140" /></a>Notice anything? Yep...NO WOMEN. No Mary Magdalene, no Mary & Martha, no early house church patronesses. Heck, Paul made the list and <i>he wasn't even around</i> in the "Jesus of Nazareth" days. But no Mary who was the first person in Matthew, Mark, and Luke's gospel to see/know of Jesus' Resurrection. <br />
<br />
The worst part, though? Irony served cold:<br />
<blockquote>The book went on sale on July 22, the Feast of Mary Magdalene.</blockquote>FAIL.Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-88148154335539593532010-07-29T18:15:00.000-05:002010-07-29T18:15:30.459-05:00Anne Rice and Christ/ianity<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/profile-ak-snc1/object3/1372/38/n66435815451_2189.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/profile-ak-snc1/object3/1372/38/n66435815451_2189.jpg" width="133" /></a></div>I never was an Anne Rice fan and only marginally enjoyed <i>Christ the Lord</i> series of books she wrote after converting. But she showed up in my feed reader this morning as <b>she has disavowed Christianity but will continue to follow Christ</b>. <br />
<br />
Let's break it down point by point. She wrote on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/annericefanpage?v=wall">her facebook page</a>:<br />
<blockquote>For those who care, and I understand if you don't: Today I quit being a Christian. I'm out. I remain committed to Christ as always but not to being "Christian" or to being part of Christianity. It's simply impossible for me to "belong" to this quarrelsome, hostile, disputatious, and deservedly infamous group. For ten years, I've tried. I've failed. I'm an outsider. My conscience will allow nothing else<br />
<div style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/annericefanpage?v=wall&story_fbid=129786343731298&ref=mf">source</a></div></blockquote>I sympathize with the perspective that Christianity is quarrelsome and full of disputes. But what group isn't? It is human nature to conflict, dispute, resolve, and move on to the next conflict. Even Christ himself was constantly in conflict with those around him, so if Rice is looking for a consistent state of nirvana, it ain't Christ.<br />
<br />
Read on for more updates and the responsibility of seeking redemption for flawed human movements.<span id="fullpost"><br />
<blockquote>As I said below, I quit being a Christian. I'm out. In the name of Christ, I refuse to be anti-gay. I refuse to be anti-feminist. I refuse to be anti-artificial birth control. I refuse to be anti-Democrat. I refuse to be anti-secular humanism. I refuse to be anti-science. I refuse to be anti-life. In the name of Christ, I quit Christianity and being Christian. Amen.<br />
<div style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/annericefanpage?v=wall&story_fbid=113868381998571&ref=mf">source</a></div></blockquote>Well, honestly, if that's Christianity then I'm not one either, on every single point. Christianity is not monolithic, and every social issue or theological issue has people across the spectrum on it. It did not begin that way, and it has only gotten more spread out over time. There will always be people to disagree with in your club, but you gotta keep your membership card to get the benefits.<br />
<br />
Finally, she writes an hour-ish ago before this post.<br />
<blockquote>My faith in Christ is central to my life. My conversion from a pessimistic atheist lost in a world I didn't understand, to an optimistic believer in a universe created and sustained by a loving God is crucial to me. But following Christ does not mean following His followers. Christ is infinitely more important than Christianity and always will be, no matter what Christianity is, has been, or might become<br />
<div style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.facebook.com/annericefanpage?v=wall#!/annericefanpage?v=wall&story_fbid=147634551917593&ref=mf">source</a></div></blockquote>For more reactions, Michael at ThinkChristian.net <a href="http://www.thinkchristian.net/index.php/2010/07/29/anne-rice-today-i-quit-being-a-christian/">wonders</a> if this is a reaction to the culture wars: people leaving Christianity due to the conflict and continuing to be "spiritual" but not part of a "religious" movement. And <a href="http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/29/24805?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+BoxTurtleBulletin+(Box+Turtle+Bulletin)&utm_content=Google+Reader">Jim at BoxTurtleBulletin</a> dredges up a status update previously that points closer to why she chose to leave Christianity as a movement:<br />
<blockquote>[Anne Rice's] embrace of Catholicism was of a personal and spiritual nature, and as is not unusual among Catholics, didn’t extend to social issues...Rice was ultimately unable to reconcile her belief in Christ on the one hand, with the actions of fellow Christians and how those actions have stained the Christian “brand” on the other. She appears to have hinted at this with this post on her facebook page which appeared on Tuesday:<br />
<br />
Gandhi famously said: “I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” <b>When does a word (Christian)become unusable</b>? When does it become so burdened with history and horror that<b> it cannot be evoked without destructive controversy</b>?</blockquote>Her last point hit me in the gut, not from realization of something but from my long-standing wrestlings with this. The way I see it is that <b>no human movement is without its flaws</b>, even the ones we believe to be divinely driven and sustained. Even the bible is not without its flaws and errors that do not translate 2000 years in the future. The constitution, heralded as the pinnacle of human freedom and collective sustainability, only considered white men to be people. <br />
<br />
Maybe that's why <b>Jesus drew people close to him as a group</b> rather than directing them one-on-one. In our flaws, we find out how to be human together. As a group together, we help those flaws become smoothed out until we are people without wax. Christianity without Christ is folly, but willingly following Christ in solitary does not heed his example either.<br />
<br />
<b>It comes down to if you think Christianity is redeemable</b>. If you want it to be redeemed, then stay inside and work for change. If your denomination's doctrine and policies rub you the wrong way, stay inside and work for change. If you love something, truly love it, then you have to see it as redeemable, and then it is your responsibility to work to redeem it...even if all you do is plant the seeds that someone in the next generation actually gets to bear fruit.<br />
<br />
What do you think? Thoughts? Post them in the comments and welcome to the conversation!</span>Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com8tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-37286435342272993942010-07-28T12:15:00.000-05:002010-07-28T12:15:14.923-05:00Who is gonna fix this mess? [video]At summer camp, our district superintendent played <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiNBmNl88Pk">this video</a> about a cinematographer whose questions about God and the human condition play out in a powerful way. It's titled "<i>A Thousand Questions</i>" and asks "who will clean up the mess humanity finds itself in?"<br />
<br />
<object height="264" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YiNBmNl88Pk&hl=en_US&fs=1?color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YiNBmNl88Pk&hl=en_US&fs=1?color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="264"></embed></object><br />
<br />
Yes, it's 10 minutes long. Yes, it's worth your time.Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-50250264295540651702010-07-28T07:39:00.001-05:002010-07-28T07:39:00.063-05:00Star Wars Yoga<div style="text-align: center;">While I'm waiting for a Star Wars-themed Eucharist or at least Baptismal liturgy, </div><div style="text-align: center;">our former John the Methodist has linked to another religious pairing with Star Wars: </div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/tie-fighter.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="211" src="http://uploads.neatorama.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/tie-fighter.jpg" width="400" /></a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.neatorama.com/neatogeek/2010/07/23/star-wars-yoga/">Star Wars Yoga positions</a>. </div><div style="text-align: center;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: center;">Since my spouse is a yoga teacher, that gives me two reasons to link to it. Enjoy!</div>Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4152029133681792030.post-89106289980223041492010-07-27T07:15:00.001-05:002010-07-27T07:15:00.351-05:00A Call for Hacker Pastors<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://home.flash.net/~rayearle/Hfiles/Hacker.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="http://home.flash.net/~rayearle/Hfiles/Hacker.png" width="320" /></a></div><br />
A few days back, Clay Johnson suggested that <a href="http://infovegan.com/2010/07/19/why-developers-should-run-for-congress">our government could use more computer developers in Congress</a> to better streamline, communicate, and provide clarity to the legislative process (h/t <a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/07/hackers-go-to-washington.html">Andrew Sullivan</a>) Many voices replied to his comments, with either stereotypical views of computer programmers that live in their parents' basements (<a href="http://www.scottberkun.com/blog/2010/should-programmers-run-for-congress/">1</a>) (<a href="http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2010/07/21/keep-developers-out-of-politics-please/">2</a>), or helpful commentary on how to build such a movement (<a href="http://govfresh.com/2010/07/how-developers-can-win-congress/">3</a>).<br />
<br />
However, Johnson has many points that struck me as relevant to this blog...so consider this a call for more developers to enter the ministry!<br />
<br />
First, Johnson argues that increasingly bureaucratic institutions are more technological and thus need technology-savvy people to administrate them.<span id="fullpost"><br />
<blockquote>Government’s problems are becoming increasingly technical… check out the first piece of legislation this Congress passed: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 isn’t just a 1000+ page bill that’s now a law, it’s also a technical specification for recovery.gov written by people who don’t know how to write specifications.</blockquote>It strikes me that as our existence is increasingly technological, <b>pastors need to speak to the role of technology in our lives</b> and I doubt many of them have strong understandings of the technology itself. Hysteria over privacy and facebook are great sermon topics but are easily fixed by simply understanding the system. Parental concerns over their children's increasing transparency online are pastoral concerns too. By encouraging more developers to enter the ministry, we will have more pastors that can speak to the role of technology in our lives.<br />
<br />
Second, Johnson suggests that computer developers are masters at transparency:<br />
<blockquote>[G]reat developers are systems fixers and systems hackers. There is no system more ripe for elegant process hacks than the United States House of Representatives. Put a developer in Congress, and they’ll start exposing data on their own. They’ll build systems to make it so they can hear from their constituents better.</blockquote>Now, this is a sticky area for hacker pastors: <b>communications in churches can't be scripted or coded</b>. There can be procedures in place but human participants will not keep to them. However, the entire system of communication could be looked at from a human systems perspective, or the application of communication theory to human systems. The image of smoky back rooms where church decisions are made (which are on the down anyway) can be more nuanced with a clearer communication center.<br />
<br />
Third and finally (OK, he has five points in the original article), Johnson notes that developers may be nerds but they've figured out how to get feedback in novel ways:<br />
<blockquote>Finally, Developers are great digital communicators. They’re great at using the medium to connect directly with people in ways that others cannot. They can build their own tools to connect with people, too. With a Developer who understands the guts of the web in a leadership spot inside Congress, Congress can start communicating more effectively online. And as this developer becomes more successful, the rest of Congress may very well follow suit.</blockquote>Yes, an unfortunate percentage of nerds are (a) socially awkward and (b) unable to communicate their feelings well. However, for those who are able to overcome such things, developers take what their constituency wants and re-presents it in creative ways.<br />
<br />
What do you think? How would computer developers fare in the parish? For those of you who are hacker pastors (and probably online and will respond...yay!), what shared skills are important in both professions?<br />
<br />
Discuss.</span>Rev. Jeremy Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10137491388537194847noreply@blogger.com1