Worst Camp Sign Ever [humor]
There's just so much wrong with this sign from FAILblog:
(1) Terrible way to shorten "Methodist Bible Campground"
(2) It's a "dead end"?
Sigh. Read more...
There's just so much wrong with this sign from FAILblog:
Mashup of Star Wars and the Princess Bride. Truly, is there any better combination?
Inconceivable.
As far as Church Growth goes, this is the best model I've seen...although it stops right when things get interesting (and, incidentally, uses Johannine chronology).
M, pls rite on tabs & giv 2 ppl.
- no1 b4 me. srsly.
- dnt wrshp pix/idols
- no omg’s
- no wrk on w/end (sat 4 now; sun l8r)
- pos ok - ur m&d r cool
- dnt kill ppl
- :-X only w/ m8
- dnt steal
- dnt lie re: bf
- dnt ogle ur bf’s m8. or ox. or dnkey. myob.
ttyl, JHWH.ps. wwjd?
While thoroughly enjoying Kester Brewin's Signs of Emergence, I hit on a passage that I'd really really like to implement:
We must reestablish ourselves as the body of Christ, not the machine of Christ. Bodies are organic, dynamic, sentient, and conscious. They have hearts. Machines break down, while bodies evolve. This metaphorical re-centering from machine to body will require us to rethink our language too, away from the industrial vocabulary of "structure" "drive" "mechanism" "steering" towards more body-centered language: "nourish" "grow" "nurture" "cultivate" and "adapt."If we are to rethink the church, then perhaps by rethinking and renaming our structure we can slowly move away from mechanistic understandings of the church.
Signs of Emergence, 85-86
One of the commonly posited notions is that the early disciples were socialists: group authority, sharing everything, trading MP3s on Nazareth's Napster. But can we fit this contemporary political tag onto a first-century system?
I think that perhaps for the first time in history, we can. Wired's most recent magazine has an article on the Web 2.0 and collaborative online ventures as "The New Socialism." One of the interesting points that Kevin Kelly makes is that socialism is usually defined as a tension between individual autonomy and the authority of the state. More authority? Socialism. More autonomy? Free market. Give and take, zero-sum trades, very little in-between.
Emerging from the web these days is "The New Socialism," which, according to Kelly, is decentralized public coordination to solve problems and create things that neither pure communism nor pure capitalism can:
The largely unarticulated but intuitively understood goal of communitarian technology is this: to maximize both individual autonomy and the power of people working together. (Wired, June 2009, 120)This articulation of socialism resonates with the biblical notion of socialism in Acts 2, Acts 4 and even echoes back to Exodus 16. Gone are the antiquainted notions of socialism as centralized authority and controlled information and resources channels, replaced by distributed authority and open transparency. And wasn't that what the Apostles were doing? Distributed authority among them all? Open transparency that replaced the rigidly controlled temple system?
Consumerism is the antithesis of contentment. If we wonder why we are not content or happy or satisfied, in his book "Enough: Contentment in the Age of Excess" Will Samson explains that we have only to look at the advertisements and media messages to explain why our houses and cars are never big enough or good enough.
Samson posits further that consumerism has infiltrated our relationship with Jesus Christ in the opposite way. We see jesus a low-cost, low-commitment counter to culture rather than the truly counterculture that Jesus represents.
Samson makes several damning points in his book that are relevant to even events in the past few months (long since the book's publication). Today, we worry about Swine Flu and other communicable diseases. Samson points out that the way we live our life can be a disease on our bodies, minds, and indeed our very souls:
...as nations gain wealth, they increase in the risk of major health problems...perhaps lifestlye disease is communicable. You catch it through prosperity. (Enough, 101)
Our lifestyle of consumerism affects our theologies by making Jesus into a low-cost alternative and everything else into conspicuous consumption.
But why isn't our church doing more about it? Why aren't we more involved in opposing this Tower of Babel-Stuff that we create? Perhaps because the church communities are too enmeshed with the ruptures of its seams. Samson points to our multi-cultural world that breaks our assumptions of Christian community that the past few centuries have found socially easy. Community is no longer something we are socially pressured into; it is something we must now earn. What would it look like? Samson says:
It seems to me that in order to move from mindless consumers of stuff to fully participating members of eucharistic communities, we must find the actions and language that can bring those communities together and allow them to interpret the power of Jesus to provide broad meaning for our lives here and now. (Enough, 143)
I enjoyed the book and, gold for a pastor, I found several sermon ideas and examples. However, I can't help but wonder what Will would write today about our movement away from the Age of Excess. His blog is long dormant. But people are saying the Age of Excess is over, dead. I disagree; I think it is just taking a breather, waiting on the wings to jump on the bandwagon again. Will the Church be ready to respond when it does? Or will we continue to buy more stuff?
Thoughts?
Blogger Template © Ourblogtemplates.com 2008
Back to TOP