Process sheet for blog startup

Thought I would let you in on how I engaged the thought process of starting this blog. Check it out after the jump:



Markus Merz from Performancing.com gives an outline of how to create a content-driven blog. I followed it and ended up with HX.net.

Here's his words in quotes, and my thought process added in...

Phase Zero: Seed the idea

Skipping the analysis part of classical product development I will assume that some idea got into my head worth to develop a content concept for a new website/blog. Basically when an idea for a new website comes to mind I structure the idea in four parts:

1. One sentence concept phrase
2. Some example article keywords
3. How to promote the site
4. How to monetize the site
OK, let's go through this:
  1. Sentence: United Methodist pastor blogs about ministry, social justice, and internet-age systems and groups theory.
  2. keywords: christianity, methodism, technology, systems theory, group theory, internet, discipleship, evangelism.
  3. promotion: Facebook friends, ministry friends, Methoblog, Blog submission websites.
  4. monetization: Will add AdSense and Amazon associates info, but that's about it. Not a money-oriented blog.
Concentrate on the content concept in a way that you can see the value of the content stand out from the crowd. Imagine a three-minute presentation to a stranger.
I'm a Christian minister, and these days it seems like everyone has their mind made up about Christianity. When you think of Christianity, I'm sure there are some thoughts that immediately come to your head. It is of this political party, it is exclusive, it is wishy-washy, its history can be as bad as Islamic fundamentalist terrorism. HackingChristianity is a blog that examines the symbols and language used by people to describe Christianity and their attractions or dis-attractions to it. There have got to be life-sustaining ways the Christian path can be attractive again. I've been in the parts of the country where Christianity is commercialized and maintains the status quo, and I've also been where it is on the margins, counter-cultural, and thus hard to be attractive to society that rejects it. I think there's a middle way, and that's what I'll be discussing here at HX.net.

In many ways, Christianity is a system that is inaccessible to some people. Turn or burn mentalities of evangelism, and the divisive nature of Christian politics have made that system inaccessible to people. There are modern ways of trying to fit into the echo-chambers or digital life-patterns of people that fail be either being too "out-there" or too accomodating to consumeristic culture. This blog will be examining how others are hacking the system, and evaluating them on their health and approach.

Finally, I read a lot of news and views, and I needed a place to let other people know what I'm reading. A Blog is perfect way to do this, so that when you do read the articles and content, you have an idea of what I read to get there.

Phase One: Community driven?

After seeding the idea (read: take a note because otherwise I will forget it) the basic concept will hang around for an uncertain amount of time. Maybe I will discuss it with friends and maybe I will set up some search feeds to follow the basic keywords to get a feeling for the existing websites.

Very important is to decide if the site should have a community part. Can or should user generated content be one of the big values your new website has to offer? The community question is one of the big web 2.0 questions. Yesterday it was 'forum or not' but today all is possible.

Will the concept be worth to develop a necessary 'community management' concept (read: time commitment) or will a simple comment function be enough? As I am not really interested in being a community manager I will always try to stay with the simple solutions as long as possible knowing that simple solutions narrow the extension possibilities of a site.
I know Web 2.0 is all the rage, but for concept formulation stages, I don't think user-generated content will be necessary. There will be open threads to start conversations, but I think commenting and linking to other people's ponds will suffice.

However, when there becomes more of a regular readership, user-generated content and examples may be much more helpful in a wiki-like setting. I will figure that out when we get there.
Phase Two: Rough content sketches

After finishing the two basic concept phases I will try some concrete tests.
I wrote out the categories for hacks previously (you can find them here), but there will be more to come. Thus, I can write about different kinds of hacks that really don't work, really do work, and really do bring in arts/media to work. We live in a digital age of systems and symbols, so by defining them ALL as hacks, we can give them a standard way of evaluating them.
Phase Three: Design and template

And here we are already leaving the 'content driven website concept' part and it starts to become time consuming work. The more you could strip down your content concept in the phases before the easier it will be now to develop a nice and reader friendly design.
I borrowed a free design from BloggerBuster.com for a newspaper. It was originally written to have only one post offered and the rest linked (like a newspaper), but I altered it to be easier to scroll and read. All "category" sections are in the upper-right. All "what?" questions are in the middle area (What is this blog, what is Jeremy reading, who are Jeremy's conversation partners, etc).

So, that's it. That's the basic thought process that went into the blog. There are other thoughts too, but I thought you'd like to see the process of birthing a new blog and how theory gets put into practice.

Read more...

Daily Read


10 Tough Psalms for Worship Songs

Posted: 15 Jan 2008 01:17 PM CST

So many great passages from the Psalms that easily lend themselves to contemporary praise and...

[[ Teasers only, click the link for the full story ]]

Read more...

What I'm Reading 04/11/2008

  • tags: no_tag

    • Churches that maintain the status quo will be lukewarm rather than hot or cold! - post by umjeremy
    • A dead body, you see, will take on the temperature of its environment. Such was the case with the church at Laodicea.


      – from Don McGee’s “Laodicea, Assuming Room Temperature”

  • tags: no_tag

    • I've been thinking a lot about the pastor as prophet. Are pastors prophets? Two comments to consider:

      In Leaves from the Notebook of a Tamed Cynic, Reinhold Niebuhr wrote, “I am not surprised that most prophets are itinerants . . . I think the real clue to the tameness of a preacher is the difficulty one finds in telling unpleasant truths to people who one has learned to love . . . Once personal contact is established you are very prone to temper your wind to the shorn sheep. It is certainly difficult to be human and honest at the same time. I’m not surprised that most budding prophets are tamed in time to become harmless parish priests.”

      In contrast (of sorts), Rev. Grace Imathiu, preaching at the 2007 Festival of Homiletics on Ezekiel’s call, asked, “How does a priest function when they are stripped of traditions, robes, when being a priest is more than just keeping the status quo? A priest in exile is a priest without safety of liturgy, office, family, class. That priest is Ezekiel. Whenever there is a crisis in the life of a priest, there is the opportunity for God to break in and the priest to be transformed into a prophet.”

Read more...

Daily Read


Is Social Justice a Distraction from the Gospel? (Part 2 of 5 by Rich Nathan)

Posted: 10 Apr 2008 10:03 AM CDT

Social justice is not a distraction from our commitment; it is part and parcel of the gospel of the...

[[ Teasers only, click the link for the full story ]]

The Top 15 Biblical Ways to Get a Wife

Posted: 21 Feb 2008 02:13 PM CST

Find an attractive prisoner of war, bring her home, shave her head, trim her nails, and give her...

[[ Teasers only, click the link for the full story ]]

The church is an organism before it is an organization

Posted: 12 Mar 2008 01:51 PM CDT

They post title is mine but the thought that follow are not. It does seem often that we spend our...

[[ Teasers only, click the link for the full story ]]

Read more...

Which Kingdom of God are you?

I'm on facebook, and you get those all those ridiculous surveys, right? The ones where you answer some simplistic questions and find out all sorts of critical life-lessons about yourself. Like...

  • Are you an Introvert or an Extrovert?
  • Which Lord of the Rings character are you?
  • Which Bible character are you?
  • What 80s song are you?
A Survey I'd like to write is this one:

Which Kingdom of God are you?
  1. What is the nature of God? (a) Violent (b) Non-violent?
  2. What is the nature of Jesus’ message? (a) Exclusive (b) Inclusive
  3. What is faith? (a) Literal belief (b) Trust in God
  4. What is deliverance? (a) Salvation from hell (b) Liberation from injustice
There are three evaluations from this. Choose one or the other and read on for more...

If you chose (a) for three or more, Congratulations! You have...
  • A THEOLOGY OF EMPIRE shaped by the Roman Empire's notion of "Peace through Victory." When Jesus returns, only those with the right beliefs will be saved, and when Jesus claims victory over the devil, then there will be peace.
If you chose (b) for three or more, Congratulations! You have...
  • A THEOLOGY OF KINGDOM shaped by Paul and Jesus' notions of "Peace through Justice" where the kingdom is found in the continuing struggle for compassion and justice. When all live in harmonious relationships, then there will be peace.
If you have equal parts (a) and (b), Congratulations! You have...
  • THE THEOLOGIES IN THE BIBLE, as both of the above theologies are prevalent and strands can be traced throughout the entire bible.
Very simplistic, but that's the nature of such polls. Of course there is middle mucky ground between the (a)s and (b)s, but to break it down so simplistically helps define the drastically different stories and pursuits by the people of God found in the bible and in contemporary society.

What hacks do is draw the connecting points between two divergent points of view. If they can exist simultaneously in the bible, then they can exist peacefully in contemporary theologies as well. And that's what we're doing here at HX.net: finding those connecting points to better bridge the divide between people with very different notions of what the Kingdom of God looks like...and especially who is in it!

Indulgences to John Dominic Crossan and his work on theologies of Empire and Gaia Rising for the idea.

Read more...

What I'm Reading 04/10/2008

Read more...

UMC Hymnal Survey: The power and peril of online groups

While this is a ministry-oriented blog, I will throw in other entertaining stuff related to my stated interests: ministry, social justice, and internet-age group theory.

This post somehow incorporates all three. Really.

Reading through Clay Shirky's Here Comes Everybody, he talks about motivation in the internet age is influenced through a plausible promise: the action called for must be "big enough to inspire interest, yet achievable enough to inspire confidence."

One such plausible promise that ties this all together is the RickRolling of the New York Mets by Fark.com. (Rickrolling is defined here, example is in this video of the Pope falling down the stairs) Fark.com had its readers fill out an online poll for a new in-game song for the Mets with the Rick Astley song. Low barrier to entry (filling out an online form), high anticipation of success (Fark's fanbase is huuuge). It won, and forced the Mets to an in-game run-off to neutralize the power of online groups. By raising the barrier to entry (namely forcing in-game participation), they removed the plausible promise of success of an organized online group.

Also, Stephen Colbert regularly uses internet groups to deface Wikipedia, name a bridge after Colbert, and other online hijinks. Colbert has definitely discovered Shirky's balance of "big enough and easy enough" by choosing obnoxious targets with online voting. Wikipedia neutralized the Colbert threat by locking page edits and forcing people to wait a few days to be able to edit their pages. By raising the barriers to entry, they removed the plausible promise of a rabid Colbert fan base.

So, to the question at hand (reworded a bit):
What is the plausible promise for ministry groups trying to influence church doctrine?


Recently reported by T.L.Steinwert is the results of the UMH Hymnody survey. The online survey had a relatively low barrier to entry, and thanks to the renewal groups, a call for populist outrage. The Good News movement requested this:

We would encourage you to participate in a hymnal survey being done currently by the church. You can share your ten most favorite hymns as well as the ten least favorite that you would like to see removed from the hymnal. Hymns such as "I Am Your Mother," "Mother God," and "Womb of Life" to just name several, have problems theologically. They would be good for your removal list.
I'm sure the other groups did too, this is just the online one I could find online evidence for.

There were 4,000ish responses. Here's the results of the bottom 20 for The Faith We Sing supplement:
1 12% Mothering God, You Gave Me Birth FWS 2050
2 10% I Am Your Mother FWS 2059
3 9% Womb of Life FWS 2046
4 8% She Comes Sailing on the Wind FWS 2122
5 7% Bring Many Names FWS 2047
6 3% A Mother Lined a Basket FWS 2189
Well, the plausible promise of the survey was achieved for the renewal groups. 6 songs with feminine images of God at the bottom 6. Well done.

But wait...what about the bottom 20 of the UMH Hymnal?
1 17% Daw-Kee, Aim Daw-Tsi-Taw 330
2 14% ¡Canta Débora, Canta! 81
3 13% Battle Hymn of the Republic 717
4 13% America (My Country, ‘Tis of Thee) 697
5 12% Onward, Christian Soldiers 575
6 18% America the Beautiful (O Beautiful…) 696
7 10% Camina, Pueblo de Dioa (Walk on…) 305
8 10% Jaya Ho Jaya Ho 478
9 9% Am I a Soldier of the Cross 511
10 9% Cantemos al Señor (Let’s Sing unto the Lord…) 149
11 8% En el Frio Invernal (Cold December) 233
12 8% Cuando el Pobre (When the Poor Ones) 434
13 8% As Man and Woman We Were Made 642
14 7% Nothing but the Blood (What Can Wash Away) 362
15 7% Silence, Frenzied, Unclean Spirit 264
16 7% There Is a Fountain Filled with Blood 622
17 7% De Tierra Lejana Venimos (From a Distant Home) 243
18 7% In the Garden 314
19 6% Heleluyan, Heleluyan 78
20 6% God of the Sparrow, God of the Whale 122
Holy carp. Look at the bolded entries. 9 outta the bottom 20 of least favorite songs are from other cultures? What kind of message are we sending to the worldwide United Methodist Church that songs from other cultures are distasteful?

It reminds me of when the Renewal groups were going to picket a Reconciling Ministries event at Lake Junaluska. They decided not to show up when the KKK said they would stand side-by-side with them. They didn't want their theological outrage to be associated with the racist and homophobic outrage of a white supremacy group.

Well, here's the difficult moment, isn't it? Alongside theological outrage at feminine images of God is ethnocentric discomfort with songs from other cultures. Let's be clear: I won't try to prove there is causation in this correlation, or even that the same people voting against feminist images of God are also voting against other culture's songs. But whenever ethnocentrism and anti-feminism collide, I am curious and wary of the results.

I see these disappointments coming from this online poll:
  • What the UMC authorities wanted was a response to their survey. What they got was a heavily politicized response that may be honest, but heavily influenced by renewal groups and caucus groups (the liberal/progressives were heard clearly too, with the battle "victory in Jesus" and blood atonement songs also in the bottom 20 of the UMH)
  • What the renewal groups wanted was outrage at feminine images of God. What they got was a survey where the majority of the least favorite songs are songs that are from our international brothers and sisters: the very people the renewal groups depend on for mostly-consistent conservative votes at General Conference.
  • What the United Methodist worship leaders wanted was a handy poll to show what songs people really like. What worship leaders in the bible belt got was little incentive to introduce songs from other cultures...because clearly, they are not welcome.
So, where do we go from here? All the tenets of an open system like United Methodism lead us to suspect these trends:
  • Surely the UMC Hymnal would get only MORE diverse as we incorporate more world voices. There will be even MORE songs that whitebread bible-belt America will be uncomfortable with. The christian symbolism will get even MORE diverse with different cultures.
  • But at the same time, group efforts to REMOVE diversity in opinion become easier to sustain. The barriers to entry of lots of people in the internet age will lower or collapse, so we will see MORE of the group-action like this and will have to deal with the responses we get.
  • I realize the UMC has a built-in defense: General Conference. Like the NY Mets and Wikipedia, the barrier to actually change and make decisions is high. But on the public image side, there are no such barriers: anyone with a following can influence public perception of the UMC. How can we vote for unity when the bitter taste of divided opinions becomes louder?
How do we as a church encourage unity in diversity in an internet age where groups wanting to remove diversity have a much stronger voice?

I don't have an answer. But maybe this link does. Discuss.

Read more...

Comment via FriendConnect

Favorite Sites

Latest from the Methoblog

Search the Methodist World

Want to see more United Methodist responses to a topic? Enter the topic into this search engine and search ONLY methodist blogs and sites!

UMJeremy's shared items

Disclaimer: all original content reflects the personal opinions of Rev. Jeremy Smith, not the doctrinal positions or statements of the United Methodist Church local and global.
all linked or quoted content represent the source's opinions, not Jeremy or the United Methodist Church.

  Blogger Template © Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP